DEMETER

A time machine for NDVI and physical features.

Etherion / Messis / DEMETER

Product direction / historical IoT → physical projection

Train the model on a field’s historical IoT measurements of physical features. With the World Indexes, the aim is short- to long-term projection of NDVI and physical features — their interconnectivity, evolution, variations and response to perturbations. A time machine for the field’s measured physical world, not another standalone NDVI score.

API business model on standby. Later: case-by-case negotiated contracts, planned against the historical IoT data your fields already hold, to train and deliver a fine-tuned model on that history.

From field history to projected futures

IoT-trained direction
  1. 01

    Existing physical history

    The measurements already recorded by the field's IoT sensors.

  2. 02

    A model trained on that history

    Fine-tune the universal physical base around the customer's measured channels and cadence.

  3. 03

    World Indexes through time

    Project NDVI and physical features together: their relationships, evolution and response to changed conditions.

Research infrastructureNVIDIA Inception Program

2

World Indexes

17

physical features in the base

69

held-out location/year histories

52

common rollout origins

00 / From satellite averages to physical history

From an NDVI calculator to coupled physical projection.

The current satellite-trained model is an average NDVI calculator. The next step is to train on historical in-situ IoT measurements, so the model learns from a field's measured physical history rather than satellite averages alone.

The objective is not just a future NDVI value. It is the joint projection of vegetation condition and physical features — soil moisture, temperature, rainfall, radiation and water balance — with the World Indexes exposing their modelled relationships and how they evolve under changed conditions.

01 / World Indexes — the product

Interconnectivity, evolution, variations and perturbations — projected through time.

World Indexes are the product. Paired with a model trained on historical IoT measurements, the aim is short- to long-term projection of NDVI and physical features: how they connect, how they evolve, and how variations and perturbations change the projected state.

Stability / Instability

How the projected state responds to changes, where its stability shifts, and how model uncertainty changes along a scenario. Read this alongside the physical trajectories, not as a standalone score.

Attention / Influence

Keep what the model attends to separate from what its projection depends on. Attention describes what is read; influence describes which inputs move the projected state. The distinction matters when inspecting interconnectivity.

Read the physical world together

Follow soil moisture, temperature and NDVI through the same modelled future. Confidence is a band for the model on that field, not a ranking of one field above another. Scenario responses are kept distinct from observed outcomes.

02 / World operations

One physical world, seven ways to explore it.

These are the planned operations of the IoT-trained model: explore a field's physical state through time and read its changing relationships with the World Indexes.

Prediction

Project NDVI and physical features together from observed history and forcing.

Simulation

Compare trajectories under different rainfall, heat or management scenarios.

Observation

Inspect measured variations and where modelled relationships change.

Speculation

Explore alternative physical futures consistent with a changed scenario.

Windback

Explore past states or disturbances consistent with the observed history.

Intervention

Explore action sequences against a desired future physical state.

Multi-head inference

Read vegetation condition, water balance and uncertainty on one projected trajectory.

03 / Completed physical-base benchmark · 7 October 2026

The base is prepared. The measurements are in.

Completed evaluation on 10,713 next-day transitions across 69 held-out location/year histories and 24 locations. These are satellite/reanalysis results for the universal physical base, not customer IoT fine-tuning results.

Next-day performance is close to the source model.

NDVI and solar-radiation RMSE changed little; soil-moisture RMSE rose while its typical absolute error fell. The eight-feature aggregate did not show a clear improvement: the paired uncertainty interval spans zero. This is a physical starting point for training on field history, not a claim that retraining alone delivered the IoT product.

60 / 69

healed histories below their persistence error

0.468211

healed median eight-feature score

0.506807

same-window persistence median

16.17%

pooled squared-error skill vs persistence

A new score contract

The summary uses only eight physical features on one common fitting-derived scale. Cumulative and derived features are reported separately, not counted as extra votes. These values replace the older aggregate on this page; they are not directly comparable to that older score.

04 / Next-day physical accuracy

Native units. Matched observations.

RMSE is shown for the source model, the prepared physical base and the same-window persistence forecast. Lower is better. Correlation describes the prepared base's prediction against observed state.

Matched next-day physical errors, completed 7 October 2026
Feature / unitSource RMSEPhysical base RMSEPersistence RMSEBase correlation
NDVI / index0.0217820.0217630.0217580.973
Soil moisture / m³/m³0.1408500.1440910.1455820.562
Temperature / °C1.7721.7891.9190.977
Rainfall / mm/day5.6065.6287.1240.376
ET0 / mm/day0.8469600.8464490.9478740.914
Humidity / %7.9908.0468.5510.931
Wind speed / m/s0.9254140.9274991.0000.711
Solar radiation / MJ/m²/day3.6113.6104.3390.828

Typical error and tail error are different

The base’s mean absolute error is 0.006229 for NDVI, 0.088473 m³/m³ for soil moisture and 2.592015 MJ/m²/day for radiation. These typical-error measures improved relative to the source, while some squared-error measures worsened. Neither statistic is substituted for the other.

05 / Evolution through time

Follow the trajectory, not just the next point.

The completed test follows 52 common origins for 1, 7, 30 and 90 days, feeding predictions back without inserting later observations. It uses supplied future ERA5 weather: a reanalysis-conditioned scenario, not weather known at forecast time.

NDVI

Endpoint RMSE / index

DaysSourceBase
10.0209010.020559
70.0481720.050858
300.1324040.156315
901.0251.425

Soil moisture

Endpoint RMSE / m³/m³

DaysSourceBase
10.1331890.140394
70.2689610.159847
303.2861.291
9019.91312.020

Solar radiation

Endpoint RMSE / MJ/m²/day

DaysSourceBase
14.2454.096
710.67510.116
3034.15327.024
90279.00485.077

Raw trajectories remain visible

Long-horizon recursive predictions drift outside physical ranges. Moisture and radiation drift decreased after preparation; NDVI drift increased. These raw results are not evidence of a validated long-term IoT forecast. The product direction remains training on the field’s actual historical measurements and reading the projected relationships with the World Indexes.

06 / Measured interconnectivity response

Change one condition. Read what moves with it.

The completed suite includes changes to rainfall, temperature, soil moisture and radiation. It reports how NDVI and other physical features respond across time, separately from forecast accuracy.

A one-day rainfall change

A +6.754173 mm/day rainfall change in the observed history produces these median absolute NDVI responses in the prepared base, with future weather unchanged.

0.001111

Day 1 / NDVI index

0.003648

Day 7 / NDVI index

0.046039

Day 90 / NDVI index

Combined conditions do not simply add

Combined rainfall and temperature changes produce a non-additive NDVI response: median absolute interaction is 0.001863 at day 1, 0.005705 at day 7 and 0.090113 at day 90. This is a measured property of the modelled scenario, not a causal field-trial result.

The index readout was evaluated at eight anchors. It keeps attention distinct from influence and scenario spread distinct from realised error.

What these responses mean

These are model responses, not observed counterfactual outcomes. Larger responses or wider scenario bands do not by themselves prove better physical knowledge, especially after a raw trajectory has drifted outside its physical range.

07 / Evaluation contract

One physical base. Explicit evidence.

The completed benchmark is kept separate from the historical release and from future customer IoT delivery.

  1. 01

    Next-day evaluation: 10,713 transitions across 69 location/year histories at 24 locations; fitting 2017–2023, evaluation 2024–2026.

  2. 02

    Both models are scored on the same 17 physical targets, with separately fitted readouts and the same physical-unit observations. The summary uses eight physical features only.

  3. 03

    Temporal evaluation: 52 common origins across all four horizons; predicted state is fed back, future weather is supplied, and raw range violations remain visible.

  4. 04

    The benchmark compares the complete base-preparation change. It is not an isolated test of removing static features and not evidence of customer IoT fine-tuning.

Read the aggregate evidence

Completed 7 October 2026 · native errors · matched scope

08 / Universal physical base — completed

The starting point for each field's measured history.

The universal physical base has completed retraining and evaluation on corrected native-unit data, with all static features stripped. Customer IoT fine-tuning is the next engagement-specific step.

Prepared physical inputs

The retrained base uses corrected soil moisture, solar radiation and the other physical inputs. It is a physical-feature starting point, not a per-crop model.

No static crop constants

All static features are stripped from the base. Its measured performance is reported above, rather than inferred from a training loss.

Cumulative features are optional

Cumulative features, such as a 30-day NDVI mean, may be retained but are optional during IoT fine-tuning. The customer's actual sensor history determines the included features.

09 / Public provenance

Benchmark observations. Customer history next.

The base benchmark uses satellite observations and reanalysis. They are not presented as in-situ measurements of a customer's field.

NASA SMAP

Satellite soil-moisture observations, measured in native volumetric units.

Sentinel-2

Vegetation and canopy observations used in the benchmark history.

ERA5

Copernicus reanalysis weather; future forcing is explicitly supplied in the rollout tests.

10 / The engagement model

Your existing history. A model fine-tuned on it.

The API business model is on standby. Later, Messis will operate through case-by-case negotiated contracts: plan against a customer's existing historical IoT data, train on that history, and deliver a fine-tuned model.

Plan against existing data

Start with the physical channels already measured on the customer's fields, their cadence and historical coverage. Define the engagement around that data.

Train and deliver the model

Fine-tune the universal physical base on that history, then deliver the fine-tuned model under the negotiated contract.

Project the measured physical world

Use the World Indexes to inspect NDVI and physical-feature interconnectivity, evolution, variations and perturbations through time.

A negotiated engagement, not a packaged API launch

The prepared base and completed benchmark are available research foundations. Customer historical IoT training and model delivery follow a case-by-case contract; they are not claimed as already completed by this benchmark.